Fic: The Descent of Man [Sherlock]
Aug. 24th, 2010 12:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yeah, I know. I have other things I should be writing, but I... Yes, I committed Sherlock fic. Hopefully when this is finished it will be out of my system. The original Holmes story this is based on is one of my favourites, even if it seems to be poorly regarded by a lot of fans. It's like the Holmes equivalent of Creature from the Pit, then. ;D
Title: The Descent of Man
Part: 1 of 3?
Characters: Sherlock, John, DI Lestrade, DS Donovan (so far)
Rating/Warnings: Gen. Some mild swearing. Discussion of gruesome offscreen violence. Scientific testing on animals.
Word count: 3,600 approx. (so far)
Summary: This one was weird even by Sherlock's standards. And if you've been reading this blog, you'll know that's weird. X-Files weird.
Disclaimer: Sherlock was created for the BBC by Stephen Moffat and Mark Gatiss, based on stories and characters created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. I do not own any of this and am making no profit from it.
The Personal Blog of
Dr. John H. Watson
1st March
The Descent of Man, Part 1
This one was weird even by Sherlock’s standards. And if you’ve been reading this blog, you’ll know that that’s weird. X-Files weird. I honestly don’t know why I’m posting this. Nobody’s going to believe it anyway. And no, in case my psychiatrist happens to read this, I am not delusional.
I’ve changed the names of the “civilians” involved, if it makes any difference. The case made the news anyway, but not the really out-there details. And what’s DI Lestrade going to do to me for naming him? Sue me? Arrest me? Both, the way my luck’s going.
Also, I reckon that if I do publicise this, with my name all over it, some of the other interested parties might not decide to “disappear” me.
Yes, living with Sherlock has made me that paranoid.
No, Dr Thompson, not clinically paranoid! Nor delusional, I think I’ll repeat, in case it wasn’t clear the first time.
So it started as these things usually do, with Sherlock texting me. Amazingly, I was actually out of the flat at the time (there’s nothing more annoying than him texting me from the next room to tell me to come and pass him the newspaper. Not that he does that. Often, anyway):
“John. Come at once if convenient - - if inconvenient come all the same. S.H.”
Yes, this is how he usually talks to me. To everyone. To say he lacks people skills is like saying Hitler got a bit cross sometimes. The thing is, he gets involved in so much dangerous stuff you don’t like to ignore him, just in case it’s something serious this time.
As it happened, he wanted me to fetch him a nicotine patch.
From his jacket pocket.
The jacket he was wearing.
After I’d finished swearing at him, he told me I’d just come from the pub, where I’d been with my sister. And that I’d messed up the job interview I’d gone to that day. I’m used to him coming out with things like that by now, but still I had to ask. He looked at me as if I was dense:
“But it’s obvious, John. I don’t like to say “elementery”, but well... You’ve been at a pub because you’ve been playing pool. You get chalk on your fingers and then wipe it on your trousers, a distinctive blue-white mark. You were with your sister because although you have been in a pub you haven’t been drinking alcohol. You usually come in reeling about like a, well, like a drunk when you’ve had more than half a shandy. You abstain when you’re with her in the mistaken belief that you’re setting a good example.”
“I could have been in a snooker hall,” I protested.
“No,” he replied, absolutely certain he was right. He was, of course. “You couldn’t have walked here from the nearest snooker hall in the time elapsed since I texted you. You didn’t run because you’re not out of breath. And have you seen the characters that frequent those places? Not your sort of people. Plus you’re even worse at snooker than you are at pool. I know you were on foot because from the state of your hair you were in the rain outside for maybe half an hour. You could have taken a cab to get here sooner, but you haven’t got any money, or didn’t want to spend what little money you have. So, that interview you went to this afternoon didn’t go too well. Did it, John?”
“There’ll be other jobs.”
“No doubt.”
He slapped on the patch and reclined in his armchair, enjoying the nicotine in his veins. At least it’s only nicotine. That’s not his real addiction, though, the reason he needs me as his flatmate. Not because he likes company (he doesn’t), not because he couldn’t afford the rent (he can). No, because he needs someone to be clever at all the time, just to prove that he is. That’s his addiction. Why do you think he has that website?
“Is that all you wanted?” I asked. He didn’t even look at me:
“John, what do you think about dogs?”
“Dogs?”
“Yes, dogs.” He seemed astonished by my stupidity. Why do I live with this bloke? Not for the friendly conversation. Oh yeah, that’s right, for the danger. “What do you think about dogs as an aid to crime-solving?”
“You’re going to get a dog?” I asked, surprised. “To help you solve crimes?”
“No, I am not going to get a dog,” he replied, witheringly. “What would you say if an otherwise placid dog suddenly attacked somebody that it knew well?”
“I don’t know,” I shrugged. “They just turn sometimes, don’t they?”
“That’s true,” he agreed. He suddenly looked up: “And there’s our visitor.”
“What visitor?” I asked, unimpressed by his mysterious act. He just gave a funny sort of smile:
“Come on, even you heard that taxi outside, didn’t you?” He looked at his watch: “Right on time too. Answer the door, John.”
“Answer your own door,” I told him as the buzzer sounded. Of course, I then went and answered the door. I only have myself to blame.
Sherlock, you may have gathered, doesn’t have many friends. Or any friends, really. Apart from me, his “friend and colleague” as he’s taken to introducing me, which he probably only does to take the piss. When anyone comes round here, it’s either DI Lestrade asking for help, DI Lestrade coming to raid us, Sherlock’s brother (I can’t say too much about him), or someone out to kill one or both of us.
You’d be surprised how often that happens.
Tonight, though, it was a tall, shy-looking man, about thirty. Glasses, long hair in a ponytail, rain-soaked anorak over shirt and tie, security badge dangling around his neck like he’d come straight from work.
“Trevor Bennett,” he said once I’d let him in, offering me his hand. “Thanks for seeing me, Mr Holmes.”
“Sorry,” I replied, “I’m his flatmate, John Watson. Sherlock’s through there. You can’t miss him; he’s the bloke with all the nicotine patches.”
“Er, yeah, right.” Trevor had that slightly scared look most “normal” people get around Sherlock. I was just hoping he hadn’t noticed the embalmed human hand on the sideboard.
“Trevor!” said Sherlock. He can fake friendliness when he wants to: “Glad you could come! This is John; you can talk in front of him. Now, about your dog…”
“It’s not my dog,” Trevor answered, perching on the sofa. I sort of hovered. “It’s my…a friend’s dog,” he continued, as if confessing to something. “Sort of.” He was more than shy, I decided. He was nervous. Scared. “His name’s
“Your friend?” asked Sherlock.
“No, the dog.”
“
“What?” Trevor instantly turned pink. I was cringing too.
“Come on, Trevor,” Sherlock smiled, rather unpleasantly. “You nearly called her your girlfriend just now, before you corrected yourself. I see from that rash on your lower jaw that you’ve very recently shaved off a beard. And you have a ponytail – in 2010? Also, I can smell your deodorant from here. The Lynx Effect! You thought you needed to tidy up, but didn’t want to cut your hair, suggesting a newish relationship. Cutting your hair’s a big commitment, after all. However, it is a relationship, not an unrequited crush, because you would never buy that tie for yourself. That’s a tasteful tie. A woman’s touch.”
“Now, that’s just sexist,” I cut in automatically. “Not to mention homophobic. It could be a boyfriend.” Trevor’s eyes bulged and I cringed even more.
“A boyfriend who wears lipstick of the same hideous shade as that smear he thinks he wiped off his cheek? Come off it, John! And look at his predictably insecure reaction to you saying that!”
“Sherlock!” I hissed, embarrassed, as Trevor got up to leave. Sherlock looked at me blankly, genuinely puzzled as to what he’d done wrong. He’s a high-functioning sociopath, if you’re reading, Dr Thompson. He sighed in annoyance:
“I’m sorry, Trevor,” he managed, and even sounded halfway sincere. He’s a good liar. “Sometimes I just get carried away with myself. Tell me about your gir…your friend’s dog.”
“
“I try,” said Holmes, his modesty even falser than his friendliness. “Now, what about
“It’s not just
“Yes,” Sherlock answered. “They’re currently at the centre of an ongoing animal rights protest. There have been death threats and vandalism in response to their use of primates in their laboratory outside
“I know what primates are,” I grumbled.
“Apes, actually,” Trevor said. “We currently have three sub-adult chimpanzees housed in the laboratory.” He fidgeted: “I work there, you see. I’m a research assistant to Dr Paul Presbury. You’ve heard of him?”
“Vaguely,” Sherlock replied. “Probably in one of those boring journals John gets in the post.” As if he doesn’t get plenty of those too. I sometimes think he knows more about medicine than I do, and I’m a doctor.
“He’s a leading neurologist and biochemist,” I told Sherlock, glad to know something he didn’t for a change. I turned to Trevor: “Isn’t he working on a cure for Alzheimer’s?”
“That’s right. Using artificial hormones to help regenerate brain tissue. Cutting edge. We use extracts from the chimps’ cranial and spinal fluid. Non-fatal procedures; those protestors are massively overreacting; if Paul succeeds, he could save millions of lives.”
“That’s protestors for you,” said Sherlock. “They protest.”
“How did you get permission to use chimps?” I asked. “That’s not common, is it?”
“We have…” Trevor hesitated again, the way he had about his girlfriend. “We have a partner organisation. I can’t really say anything.”
“Meaning it’s the Ministry of Defence,” Sherlock observed. “Or somebody saying they’re the Ministry of Defence. I don’t think you should tell us about that. What about the dog?”
“It’s not really the dog,” said Trevor, anxiously. I could see him sweating. “It’s Paul – Dr Presbury. I’m worried about him.”
“Is he ill?” I asked, wondering why he’d come to Sherlock for help with that.
“No,” he said. “He’s healthier than he’s ever been. He’s sixty-one, but he looks forty-five. No, it’s…the way he’s been acting.”
“Go on,” said Sherlock. I could see that he was intrigued. Not that he could care less about Trevor or Dr Presbury, but likes a good puzzle.
“About four weeks ago he went to a neurological conference in
“Different in what way?”
“Irritable. Aggressive. You know, he normally never has a cross word for anybody, but all of a sudden you can’t say anything to him without getting your head bitten off.”
“So, he’s in a bad mood?” Sherlock asked, patronisingly.
“Yeah, except Paul never has bad moods.”
“Could it be trouble at home?” I asked.
“He doesn’t do “at home”,” Trevor replied. “He’s been divorced twenty years, his parents are dead, no kids, no close relatives. All he has is his work.”
“A man after my own heart,” Sherlock commented. He meant it.
“A couple of days after he returned from
“Tell me about it,” I nodded, thinking of my own employment woes.
“So where does
“Edith…” Trevor hesitated. “Edith Morphy,” he explained. “She’s our animal keeper; she looks after the test subjects.
“I’m sure it is,” said Sherlock, with a grimace. He doesn’t like being told he wouldn’t understand something.
“Edith is a wonderful person,” Trevor explained. Yeah, he had it bad for her. You could tell.
“Apart from her taste in lipstick,” said Sherlock.
“A bit too kind-hearted for the job she does,” he went on. “She’s sort of adopted Roy, and you can see why, he’s a friendly dog. Takes all his injections without as much as a growl. It’s going to be too bad when we have to dissect his brain.”
A brief, embarrassed pause descended over the room at that. Well, you can see why.
“Go on,” Sherlock urged, impatiently.
“Anyway,” Trevor continued, “Paul has worked on
“The date,” Sherlock demanded.
“Er…” Trevor gave that some thought. “February the fourth? We were giving
“You’d think you were planning to dissect his brain or something,” Sherlock pointed out dryly.
“Look,” said Trevor, “I get enough of that every day from those protestors.” Sherlock shrugged. “Anyway,
“Date?” Sherlock demanded.
“I know that,” said Trevor. “February thirteenth. It was in the papers, you might have seen it. The whole lab was trashed and some of the animals got loose. Security and the police thought the protestors had broken in, but…”
“Who else would it be?” I wondered.
“The thing is, there’s a night watchman, guard dogs, a wire fence. I can’t see how they’d get in, let alone get out again. No slogans painted anywhere, and they left the animals wandering around to get recaptured…”
“CCTV?” asked Sherlock.
“Didn’t see anything. Like whoever it was knew where the cameras were and how to avoid them.”
“And obviously you suspect Paul Presbury,” said Sherlock, looking at Trevor over the top of his steepled fingers.
“He wouldn’t do that,” Trevor protested. “It was his work! We lost months of research thanks to that mindless destruction…”
“You wouldn’t be here otherwise,” said Sherlock. “You think your boss went mad and trashed his own lab.”
“No…”
“You do,” said Sherlock. “Even if you haven’t admitted it to yourself yet. You came here because you hope I’ll be able to work out what’s wrong with Dr Presbury and end it without getting the police involved and without destroying his career. Your loyalty is touching, Trevor.” He didn’t have to sneer like that as he said it, I thought.
“Well, Mr Holmes,” said Trevor, swallowing hard. “What do you think?”
“I think I’m going to think about it,” said Sherlock. “And I also think John and I need to meet Dr Presbury, and Roy, and your “friend” Edith, and have a look around your lab.”
“Well, it isn’t open to the public…” he protested.
“Don’t worry,” said Sherlock, with another fake smile. “We’ll think of something.” And with that, he slumped back in the chair again, eyes fixed on the ceiling. After a couple of minutes’ silence, Trevor and I realised we were dismissed.
“I’m sorry,” I told Trevor as I showed him out. “He’s a bit…”
“He’s a bit of a prick,” Trevor observed.
“He is,” I conceded, “but a genius prick. He’ll sort this out for you, and for your friends. It’ll be alright.”
“Thanks, John.” I watched him go off down the wet street. When I think of it now, I feel queasy. And guilty. I mean, there was nothing I could have done, I tell myself.
But I told him it was going to be alright!
Upstairs, Sherlock was still in the chair. He’d be there all night. He is when he’s working on a “three patch problem”.
“John!” he called as I went past the door.
“Get your own patches,” I called back. “I’m turning in.”
“No,” he said, slowly. “What date is it today?”
I thought about it for a moment.
“Hurry up, John!”
“February the twenty-second.”
“I thought so.” He went silent again for a bit, then: “Interesting…”
I left him to it and went to bed to toss and turn. When I did drop off, I found myself dreaming about the ‘Stan. I don’t do that as often as I used to. I don’t talk about that stuff, anyway. Sorry, Dr Thompson.
In between dreams, I punched my pillow and listened to Sherlock murdering that bloody violin in the sitting room. I wouldn’t mind if he could play it properly. Eventually he stopped, but by then the daylight was streaming through the crack in the curtains and I’d decided to stop pretending I was getting any sleep. I went through to the kitchen in my dressing gown to make coffee. Sherlock was, as predicted, still in the chair, fully dressed, empty Nicorette packets littering the horrible carpet around his feet.
“Morning,” I said, blearily.
“Quiet! I’m thinking!”
“Right.” And then the buzzer went off again. Two visitors in two days, some sort of record! I thought it might be Trevor. I was wrong of course.
“Hello,” I said, unenthusiastically.
“It’s just the police again, dear!” our landlady called up the stairs.
“Thanks, Mrs Hudson!”
“Is Sherlock in?” Detective Inspector Lestrade asked, wedging his foot in the door. “We need to talk.”
“Yeah, he’s in there,” I mumbled. Lestrade was already on his way past, leaving me blinking at DS Donovan behind him.
“You too, John,” she said, indicating that I should go into the sitting room.
“Are you here for help?” I asked, hopefully, not liking either detective’s manner. There was something up here.
“No,” she told me, delightedly. “We’re here to question the two of you.” She loves her work, Sally, especially when it involves cracking down on Sherlock. Be honest, you can see how someone could take a dislike to him.
“Trevor Bennett,” said Lestrade, when Sherlock and I were seated, the two coppers standing over us.
“Trevor who?” Sherlock asked, without a flicker.
“This isn’t one of your games, Sherlock,” the DI suggested. “We checked his computer. You were one of the last people he emailed.” It took me a moment to realise what that meant.
“Last people he emailed before what?” I asked.
“Trevor Bennett’s dead,” said Sally. “He was killed in the early hours of this morning.”
“How?” I asked, shocked. I could barely think. I’d been talking to him only a few hours ago. I told him it’d be alright. Sherlock didn’t even blink as Sally replied:
“His head was beaten in. It looked like a puddle of strawberry jam.”
Look, this post has gone on too long anyway, and that’s as good a place to end it for now as any. I’m sorry, but just thinking about Trevor Bennett is making me sick. I didn’t know this case had got under my skin so much. So, I’ll pick this up again tomorrow, job interviews and Sherlock allowing. Thanks for reading. I have to take a shower now, or steal some of Sherlock’s patches, or something. Anything.
8 comments
Yes, John, very good! Once again, you manage to reduce what should be a series of enlightening scientific lectures into…a story. As I keep telling you, I don’t have adventures, I solve puzzles. I think your online “friends” would enjoy reading more about my deductions and the reasoning behind them instead of your attempts to write blokey prose. And you managed to compare me to Hitler at one point too. Well done, John! Yes, that was sarcasm.
Sherlock Holmes 1 March 17:18
Oh, and you misspelled “elementary”. I know you medical practitioners generally have a bad track record with that kind of thing, but really.
Sherlock Holmes 1 March 17:20
So John, that’s why you ran out so quickly the other night? To see your new boyfriend! All makes sense now. Didn’t I read about this Bennett thing in the Mail?
Harry Watson 1 March 18:23
I’m not going to dignify any of the above comments with a response.
John Watson 1 March 21:27
It would be churlish of me, wouldn’t it, to point out that you just have?
Sherlock Holmes 1 March 21:34
And i kep teling you, i like a #drink. So what?! No big deal.
Harry Watson 1 March 23:56
Harry, you have a problem and need help. I’ve decided not to be tactful about this any more.
John Watson 2 March 08:18
Ah, Dr Presbury from
Anonymous 3 March 00:12
no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 11:31 pm (UTC)The original is a favourite of mine too (even though it freaks me the fuck out), so when I got to: “What would you say if an otherwise placid dog suddenly attacked somebody that it knew well?” I may possibly have squealed. AND THE DOG IS STILL CALLED ROY. This pleases me irrationally.
"It’s going to be too bad when we have to dissect his brain.”
A brief, embarrassed pause descended over the room at that. Well, you can see why.
I snorted so hard I choked.
And the comments! Absolute brilliance, all of this. So looking forward to the rest of it, thank you <3
(And I don't know if it was intentional, but the snooker deductions, a canon reference? Not investing in any South African securities in the near future, eh Watson!)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:46 pm (UTC)It is just a creepy, unsettling premise for a Holmes story - and even more so for what it hints at (editorial rules obviously being stricter in the 20s when it was written). People tend to write off the later stories as not as good, writeen by a disinterested ACD (quite apart from the cracky sf element in that particular one), but the thing that strikes me about them is that while they're not as brilliant as the early ones, they are a lot darker and quite experimental compared to the mid-period ones. It would be interesting to speculate as to how much of this was down to the effect WW1 had on the author...
Ahem.
But yeah, he's got to be called Roy! XD And glad you liked the jokes. I'll see what I can do about the next bit.
And yeah...I was going to try to work in something about John keeping his chequebook in Sherlock's drawer...but really there's no way this John would let Sherlock anywhere near his chequebook, is there? :D
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-23 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 02:12 am (UTC)And I think I vaguely remember the story this is based on, enough to think I know where this is going anyway...
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:57 pm (UTC)Yeah, any ideas? The only archive site I use really is Teaspoon. I looked at Fanfiction Net, but I sort of disapprove of them since I heard they won't allow certain types of stories or something...
Aha, yeah, the original story is That One... I love it for its crackiness and also for the quite dark, freaky stuff going on under the surface. Arthur Conan Doyle did turn out some messed-up stories in the latter part of his life...
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 02:05 am (UTC)Though, I have been informed that there is some kind of coded warning system involving fruit (not that half the posters know what it is/use it).
That's not to say there's not good stuff on there (and I've been taking the plunge in my on-going search for good Eleven fic) but the typos and unlabelled smut you must wade through. Egads.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 07:44 pm (UTC)But yeah, I don't really read non-Doctor Who fic except here on my lj flist, so other than specialist DW archives I don't really know of anywhere (reputable!) I could post this other than here. There are probably Holmes fanfic archives out there, but I don't know how they'd take to Sherlock stuff swamping them (as it probably is right now).
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 02:20 am (UTC)I look forward to more of John's blog posts!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:58 pm (UTC)And thank you very much indeed; I'm glad you're liking it so far and I'll try to get more of it done shortly.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 04:37 pm (UTC)Since I've read very few Sherlock stories (sorry, ACD, but your misogyny, typical though it is for the era, really pisses me off!), I've no idea where this is going and look forward to finding out!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 08:02 pm (UTC)Haha- well, be prepared to go "what the - ?" And I know what you mean about ACD. Quite apart from his Victorian attitudes, the guy had issues, mainly connected to his very difficult family circumstances. You can see some of the preoccupations of his life coming out in the Holmes stories, but not to the extent they maybe did in some of his other writings (Holmes never converted to Spiritualism like his other famous character Professor Challenger did, for instance...)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 09:20 pm (UTC)ACD is one of those characters in history who, the digger you deep, the stranger they get.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 07:45 pm (UTC)Indeed he was. There were a lot of them about in those days (not that there's ever a shortage of them in any age).
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 05:21 am (UTC)Prepares to say "What the...?" :D
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 06:35 am (UTC)I remember the original ACD story though. Cracky as heck. Proof positive that while Doyle knew that wasn't physically possible, he had no problem spinning facts and tossing science out the window if it interfered with a ripping good yarn.
And plus that bit of the father peeping in his daughter's bedroom while "under the influence." Is that really creepy or what? It sounds way too incestuous for Victorian audiences. Though I've always wondered if Dr. Roylott and Mr Rucastle had other reasons for not wanting their step/daughters to get married. (It's know now that molesters can get jealous when their vics start dating.)
Anyway.. off to continue reading what you have...
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 09:42 am (UTC)Yeah, I really like the original for its strangeness and creepiness - people tend to put down the later Holmes stories, but I think that, while they don't measure up to the brilliance of the early ones, they're certainly more interesting than the middle-period stories, more experimental in style and subject matter and also quite shockingly dark in tone, within the censorship standards of the 1920s. It may have something to do with the effect WW1 had one ACD, or he might just have been trying to keep himself interested in Holmes. Either way, they deserve more respect than they sometimes get from fans.
I think that's right...I think that creepiness is one of the things that runs through the story. Even if Doyle doesn't come out and say it, the reader notices something isn't quite right... And yes, the same with the Speckled Band and the Copper Beeches - that sense of unease, of what isn't said as much as what is stated. And of course ACD, while his father wasn't abusive, certainly came from an extremely dysfunctional family and you can see the influence of that on the stories - he does rake over a lot of his own baggage in depicting some of the strange family relationships etc that Holmes encounters.
Having said that, I completely miss out the incest angle here and squash the two female characters together into one, while losing much of the subtlety...but hey, I don't pretend to be ACD! XD
And the Granada TV adaptation of this one, with Jeremy Brett, is the stuff of nightmares. Really scary. Or I thought so anyway. Brrr...
no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 02:28 am (UTC)Have you read "Naked is the Best Disguise"? I can't remember who wrote it, but if you google the title you're sure to find the author. The author alleged that Doyle was actually trying to make some statements that weren't really allowed by censorship standards of the day and so he hid stuff.
And maybe that was a way to keep himself interested in writing the stories...
Now I'm wondering if there's any analysis of the later stories. I did a biography on Doyle way back in high school. (I can't remember which of his relatives died of alcoholism.)
I'm sure WWI would have affected all the writers; that was such a horrific war (not that any war is not horrific) but poison gas had not been used in previous wars, and WWI also had the stupidity of Haig and others who used battle tactics that should have died out in the American Civil War.
I'm trying to remember where I read that it was called the first 'modern' war. Military History magazine also called Field Marshal Haig "The Worst General."
no subject
Date: 2010-10-04 08:39 pm (UTC)It was Doyle's father who suffered from alcoholism and mental illness and spent the last part of his life locked away. And yet, while we think of Victorians as being repressed and secretive about that kind of thing, Doyle does address some of the issues rising from his family life very directly in some of the stories - Watson's alcoholic brother for instance, and some quite campaigning observations about contemporary marriage laws etc in some of the stories.
And yes, you're right, WW1 made an enormous impression upon the whole culture and just about everyone who was alive when it happened - it came as a terrible shock to the whole world, just because of how brutal it was. And of course Doyle also had his interests in Spiritualism etc which probably fed into the slightly more supernatural tone of some of the late stories as well (even if he never featured outright paranormal elements as he did in his Professor Challenger stories as time went on).
no subject
Date: 2010-10-04 05:22 am (UTC)I read The Seven Percent Solution, in which Watson and Sigmund Freud made Holmes go through cold-turkey cocaine withdrawal, and Freud wanted to understand Holmes' background, so he asked under hypnosis. That version would have it that the mother was unfaithful, and the father killed both the mother and her lover. Which could certainly explain Sherlock avoiding relationships and having such a strong need to see justice done.
Then I rewatched Granada's "Cardboard Box," and got this "oh dear" feeling in light of having read 7%, because that's a case of a man killing his (ex-)wife and her lover, and there was something desolate in that final scene of Holmes standing in the snow, staring at the bodies in the ice, thinking that all this violence must have meaning, because otherwise the universe would have no purpose and that's unacceptable. *shiver*
Anyway, yeah, when I rewatched Granada's "Creeping Man," I thought, "Okay, what with being ouside her window while in beast mode, he's definitely got an unhealthy interest in his daughter!"
no subject
Date: 2010-10-04 08:51 pm (UTC)It is interesting, the ACD stories obviously mention Mycroft, and Sherlock's university years get a mention, and even Holmes's grandmother in one throwaway line, but I don't recall anything about his parents. Mind you, they don't mention Watson's parents either, so...
I've seen the film of Seven Percent Solution, if that counts! Robert Duvall does a horrible English accent as Watson! :D But yeah, it does cast that scene in Cardboard Box in an interesting light when you mention it... Another good story, I think, with some brutal imagery (mind you, there is a surprising amount of blood and gore going on in some of the stories, all things considered...)
Yeah, that bit where he's peering in through the bedroom window creeps me the hell out, I don't mind saying. I think the Granada version does a good job of highlighting the creepy vibes present in the original story and doing so in a way that makes them work in television form.